Effectiveness and Efficiency of Resource Management and School Learning Outcomes in Public Primary Schools in Gasabo District, Rwanda

Authors

  • Mr. Kabandana Theoneste School of Education, Mount Kigali University, Kigali, Rwanda Author
  • Dr. Andala Opiyo Hesbon (PhD) Mount Kigali University image/svg+xml Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53983/ijmds.v15n07.001

Keywords:

resource management, school learning outcomes, resource planning, resource utilization, resource monitoring, resource adequacy, public primary schools, Gasabo District, Rwanda

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness and efficiency of resource management on school learning outcomes in public primary schools in Gasabo District, Rwanda. Guided by Resource-Based View Theory and Educational Production Function Theory, the study focused on four dimensions of resource management: resource planning, resource utilization, resource monitoring, and resource adequacy. A descriptive-correlational survey design with a concurrent mixed-methods approach was employed. From a target population of 1,623 stakeholders (82 headteachers, 1,540 teachers, and 1 District Education Officer) across 82 public primary schools, a stratified and purposive sample of 321 respondents was determined using the Yamane (1967) formula. Data were collected from 294 teachers through structured questionnaires, 16 headteachers through semi-structured interviews, and 1 District Education Officer through a key informant interview, yielding an overall response rate of 96.9%. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and inferentially using Pearson correlation and regression analysis in SPSS, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Findings revealed that all four dimensions of resource management significantly and positively predict school learning outcomes. Resource planning accounted for 37.5% of the variance in learning outcomes (R = 0.612, R² = 0.375, F = 174.67, p < 0.001; β = 0.612). Resource utilization explained 34.4% of the variance (R = 0.587, R² = 0.344, F = 153.07, p < 0.001; β = 0.587). Resource monitoring accounted for 33.4% (R = 0.578, R² = 0.334, F = 146.29, p < 0.001; β = 0.578). Resource adequacy explained 36.1% (R = 0.601, R² = 0.361, F = 164.48, p < 0.001; β = 0.601). The combined multiple regression model explained 56.0% of the variance in school learning outcomes (R = 0.748, R² = 0.560, p < 0.001), confirming that the four dimensions operate as an integrated, mutually reinforcing system rather than as isolated practices. Qualitative findings corroborated the quantitative results, identifying delayed funding, limited teacher participation in planning, inconsistent monitoring feedback, and persistent resource shortages as constraints on further improvement. The study concludes that effective and efficient resource management is a multidimensional and integrated determinant of school learning outcomes, and recommends strengthening participatory resource planning, building capacity for resource utilization, improving monitoring and accountability systems, and addressing funding and distributional inequities, particularly in high-enrollment urban schools.

References

[1] Adeyemi, T. O. (2020). Resource-based approaches to improving academic performance in Nigerian primary schools. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(5), 987–1003.

[2] American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).

[3] Amin, M. E. (2023). Social science research: Conception, methodology and analysis. Makerere University Printery.

[4] Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

[5] Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2020). Research in education (12th ed.). Pearson.

[6] Byamukama, D. (2022). Resource planning and learner achievement in Ugandan primary schools. African Journal of Educational Studies, 20(2), 44–60.

[7] Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2021). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

[8] Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2021). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

[9] Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

[10] Darling-Hammond, L. (2021). The right to learn: A blueprint for equity in education. Harvard Education Press.

[11] Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2022). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 26(2), 97–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

[12] Finnish National Agency for Education. (2022). National core curriculum for basic education 2022. https://www.oph.fi/en

[13] Goldhaber, D. (2023). Teacher quality and school accountability in the United States. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 31(45), 1–28.

[14] Goldratt, E. M. (1990). Theory of constraints. North River Press.

[15] Goss, P., & Sonnemann, J. (2022). Resource planning and school performance in Australia. Grattan Institute.

[16] Guarino, C. M., Santibañez, L., & Daley, G. A. (2021). Teacher recruitment and retention: A review of the recent literature. Review of Educational Research, 91(1), 1–35.

[17] Hanushek, E. A. (2023). Education production functions. In Handbook of the Economics of Education. Elsevier.

[18] Harris, D., & Williams, K. (2022). Monitoring systems and academic achievement in U.S. public primary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(3), 301–318.

[19] Hedges, L. V., Laine, R. D., & Greenwald, R. (1994). Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 23(3), 5–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023003005

[20] Ingersoll, R. (2020). Effective teaching in high-performing countries: Lessons from Finland and Singapore. Educational Researcher, 49(6), 395–406.

[21] Ingersoll, R. (2023). The state of American teachers: Challenges and opportunities. National Center for Education Statistics.

[22] Jones, L., & Taylor, K. (2023). Resource adequacy and academic achievement in English primary schools. British Journal of Educational Studies, 71(2), 189–206.

[23] Kabagema, E. (2020). Challenges in primary education resource allocation in Kigali, Rwanda. Kigali University Press.

[24] Kamanzi, J. (2020). School resource management and student outcomes in Rwanda. Rwanda Education Board.

[25] Kamau, P. (2022). Resource utilization, monitoring, and adequacy in Kenyan public primary schools. Kenya Journal of Education, 12(4), 140–158.

[26] Kenya National Union of Teachers. (2020). Report on teacher and school resource shortages in Kenya. KNUT Publications.

[27] Kothari, C. R. (2014). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (3rd ed.). New Age International.

[28] MINEDUC. (2022). Annual education statistics report. Government of Rwanda.

[29] MINEDUC. (2023). Public primary school resource allocation report. Government of Rwanda.

[30] Martin, R., & Lee, S. (2023). Longitudinal monitoring and resource management in Australian primary schools. Asia-Pacific Journal of Education, 43(1), 55–72.

[31] Mokoena, S. (2023). Strategic resource planning and utilization in South African disadvantaged schools. South African Journal of Education, 43(2), 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43ns2a2193

[32] Moyo, J. (2021). Targeted resource allocation and outcomes in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 82, 102–118.

[33] Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Acts Press.

[34] Munyaneza, P. (2022). Resource distribution and learning outcomes in Gasabo District primary schools. Kigali Education Journal, 5(2), 45–60.

[35] Munyaneza, P., & Ndayambaje, E. (2023). Resource planning and school performance in Rwandan primary schools. Rwanda Journal of Education, 7(1), 12–28.

[36] National Center for Education Statistics. (2020). The condition of education 2020. U.S. Department of Education.

[37] Ndayambaje, E. (2022). Resource utilization and adequacy in Rwandan public primary schools. Rwanda Journal of Education, 6(2), 33–50.

[38] Ndayisaba, J. (2022). Monitoring practices and instructional quality in Rwandan primary schools. Rwanda Journal of Education, 6(3), 66–80.

[39] Ndlovu, T. (2023). Monitoring, accountability, and learner achievement in South African schools. African Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(1), 40–58.

[40] Ngabonziza, D., & Mujawamariya, D. (2020). Impacts of resource scarcity on primary education in Rwanda. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(19), 1–12.

[41] Njeru, M. (2022). Resource allocation and educational performance in Kenyan primary schools. African Journal of Education Research, 10(3), 55–70.

[42] Nabunya, P. (2022). Resource allocation, monitoring, and equity in Ugandan schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(6), 665–682.

[43] OECD. (2020). Education at a glance 2020: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/69096873-en

[44] OECD. (2023). School resources and student outcomes: A comparative review. OECD Publishing.

[45] Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25(9), 833–848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.25.9.833

[46] Rwanda Education Board. (2021). Annual school performance report. REB Publications.

[47] Sahlberg, P. (2020). Finnish lessons 3.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.

[48] Shenton, A. K. (2022). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 40(1), 63–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201

[49] Smith, J., & Brown, L. (2021). Resource utilization and student engagement in primary education. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(7), 789–805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-02-2020-0046

[50] UNESCO. (2021). Global education monitoring report 2021: Non-state actors in education. UNESCO Publishing.

[51] UNESCO. (2024). Education resource monitoring report 2024. UNESCO Publishing.

[52] Uganda National Teachers Union. (2021). Annual report on teacher and school resources in Uganda. UNATU Publications.

[53] Uwimana, F. (2022). Resource planning practices in Rwandan public primary schools. Rwanda Journal of Educational Research, 6(1), 20–35.

[54] Uwimana, F. (2023). Resource utilization and adequacy in Rwandan primary schools. Rwanda Journal of Educational Research, 6(4), 88–104.

[55] Uwineza, J. (2023). Resource monitoring and school learning outcomes in Rwanda. Rwanda Journal of Education, 7(2), 45–61.

[56] von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.

[57] Wambua, G. (2020). Strategic resource deployment and school performance in Kenya. International Journal of Educational Research, 58(2), 119–132.

[58] Wilson, K., & Harris, L. (2020). Control theory application in school resource management. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(2), 210–226.

[59] Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-15

How to Cite

Theoneste , K., & Hesbon, A. O. (2026). Effectiveness and Efficiency of Resource Management and School Learning Outcomes in Public Primary Schools in Gasabo District, Rwanda . International Journal of Management and Development Studies, 15(7), 01-14. https://doi.org/10.53983/ijmds.v15n07.001

Similar Articles

1-10 of 58

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.