Influence of School Leadership Practices on Student Involvement in Decision-Making in Public Day Secondary Schools: Evidence from Gasabo District, Rwanda

Authors

  • Mr. Kwizera Jean de Dieu Department of Educational Leadership and Management, School of Education, Mount Kenya University, Kigali, Rwanda Author
  • Dr. Ruth Thinguri, PhD Department of Educational Leadership and Management, School of Education, Mount Kenya University, Kigali, Rwanda Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53983/ijmds.v15n04.007

Keywords:

school leadership practices, student involvement, decision-making, participatory leadership, transformational leadership, Rwanda, secondary education

Abstract

This study examined the influence of school leadership practices on student involvement in decision-making in public day secondary schools in Gasabo District, Rwanda. Guided by Transformational Leadership Theory and Participative Leadership Theory, four leadership dimensions were investigated: organizing inclusive meetings, communication strategies, student empowerment, and engagement practices. A mixed-methods design with a concurrent triangulation strategy was employed. From a target population of 618, a sample of 243 respondents was selected through Yamane's formula; 239 valid questionnaires (98.3% response rate) were returned by teachers and students, while qualitative data were gathered from school leaders and sector education officers through semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis in SPSS Version 27; qualitative data were subjected to thematic analysis. Cronbach's Alpha confirmed strong internal reliability (α > 0.700). Findings revealed that all four leadership dimensions significantly influenced student involvement: organizing meetings (B = 0.39, β = 0.36, p < .001, R² = 0.450), communication strategies (B = 0.34, β = 0.31, p < .001, R² = 0.410), student empowerment (B = 0.34, β = 0.32, p < .001, R² = 0.410), and engagement practices (B = 0.35, β = 0.33, p < .001, R² = 0.430). Together, the four predictors explained 43.0% of the variance in student involvement. Qualitative findings corroborated these results, showing that participatory, communicative, and empowerment-oriented leadership significantly enhances student confidence, ownership, and accountability. The study concludes that fostering participatory leadership, institutionalizing structured engagement mechanisms, and building student leadership capacity are essential for advancing democratic school governance in Rwanda.

References

[1] Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.

[2] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and being clear about the process. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 36(2), e2223. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2223

[3] Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.

[4] Bush, T. (2018). Transformational leadership: Exploring common conceptions. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(6), 883–887. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218795745

[5] Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2021). School leadership models: What do we know? School Leadership & Management, 41(4), 343–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2021.1882735

[6] Costa, P., Parente, M., & Pereira, A. (2023). Participative leadership and organizational commitment in schools. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 11(1), 44–69. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.2023.9876

[7] Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2024). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage.

[8] Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.

[9] Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2020). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863

[10] García, M., & Thornton, K. (2023). Communication, trust, and student engagement in secondary schools. Journal of School Leadership, 33(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/10526846221112345

[11] Goodall, J. (2021). Moving the goalposts: Parental engagement with children's learning shifts focus. School Leadership & Management, 41(4), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2021.1891904

[12] Gumus, S., Bellibas, M. S., Esen, M., & Gumus, E. (2022). A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 2015 to 2019. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(1), 56–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220922252

[13] Hallinger, P. (2022). A systematic review of research on educational leadership and management in Africa: Mapping the terrain. School Leadership & Management, 42(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2021.1942567

[14] Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2023). The dark side of leadership and management. School Leadership & Management, 38(5), 475–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2018.1509276

[15] Ingabire, M., & Tuyisenge, F. (2022). The role of participatory leadership in promoting student governance in Rwandan secondary schools. East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 3(1), 45–58.

[16] Iradukunda, J., & Mugwaneza, T. (2021). Inclusive leadership and student participation in decision-making: A case study of Gasabo District secondary schools. Rwanda Journal of Education, 8(1), 76–90.

[17] Khalifa, M. A., Gooden, M. A., & Davis, J. E. (2021). Culturally responsive school leadership: A synthesis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1272–1311. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316630383

[18] Kraft, M. A., & Dougherty, S. M. (2020). The effect of teacher–family communication on student engagement. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6(3), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2012.743636

[19] Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077

[20] Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230010320064

[21] Mburuki, P., & Thinguri, R. (2023). School leadership and student engagement in public secondary schools in Kenya. Journal of Education and Learning, 12(3), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v12n3p66

Downloads

Published

2026-04-15

How to Cite

Kwizera, J. de D., & Ruth, T. (2026). Influence of School Leadership Practices on Student Involvement in Decision-Making in Public Day Secondary Schools: Evidence from Gasabo District, Rwanda. International Journal of Management and Development Studies, 15(4), 52-61. https://doi.org/10.53983/ijmds.v15n04.007

Similar Articles

1-10 of 27

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.