Head Teachers’ Management Practices and Dropout Rates in Public Secondary Schools in Gisagara District, Rwanda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/ijmds.v15n10.003Keywords:
Head teachers’ management practices, dropout rates, resource allocation, teacher supervision, student retention, RwandaAbstract
This study examined the influence of head teachers’ management practices on dropout rates in public secondary schools in Gisagara District, Rwanda. Specifically, the study investigated the effects of resource allocation, student discipline monitoring, individualized student support, and teacher supervision on dropout rates. The study was guided by Contingency Theory and Tinto’s Student Integration Theory. A cross-sectional survey design with a mixed-methods approach was adopted. The target population was 285 respondents (29 head teachers and 256 teachers), from which a sample of 166 respondents (17 head teachers and 149 teachers) was selected using simple random and purposive sampling techniques. Data were collected using questionnaires administered to teachers (response rate 100%) and interview guides for head teachers. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and regression analysis in SPSS, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. The findings revealed that resource allocation (β = 0.974, R² = 0.949), individualized student support (β = 0.844, R² = 0.713), teacher supervision (β = 0.849, R² = 0.722), and student discipline monitoring (β = 0.622, R² = 0.387) each had a significant influence on dropout rates (p < 0.001), with resource allocation emerging as the strongest predictor. The study concludes that effective head teacher management practices play a vital role in student retention. It recommends timely and equitable resource provision, stronger discipline monitoring systems, wider individualized student support, and consistent teacher supervision.
References
[1] Akomolafe, C. O., & Adesua, V. O. (2019). Influence of resource provision on dropout among secondary school students in Nigeria. International Journal of Educational Research, 98.
[2] Chikodzi, D., & Nyoni, T. (2023). Discipline monitoring and school retention in secondary education. International Journal of Educational Research, 116.
[3] Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
[4] Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. McGraw-Hill.
[5] Karugu, S., & Githui, M. (2023). Instructional leadership and student dropout: Evidence from Nairobi’s low-income schools. Journal of Educational Leadership, 18(4).
[6] Kifle, M., & Tadele, T. (2020). Mixed-methods study on psychosocial support and dropout in Ethiopia.
[7] Komba, H. J., & Mwansasu, F. (2021). Impact of discipline monitoring systems on secondary school dropout in Tanzania. Tanzanian Journal of Education Research, 8(2).
[8] MINEDUC. (2020). Education statistical yearbook. Ministry of Education, Rwanda.
[9] MINEDUC. (2021). Education statistical yearbook. Ministry of Education, Rwanda.
[10] MINEDUC. (2022). Education sector performance report. Ministry of Education, Rwanda.
[11] MINEDUC. (2023). Vision 2050 and Education Sector Strategic Plan (ESSP) 2018–2024. Ministry of Education, Rwanda.
[12] MINEDUC. (2024). Education statistical yearbook. Ministry of Education, Rwanda.
[13] Mokoena, M. (2021). Educational resource allocation and learner retention in rural Limpopo, South Africa. African Journal of Rural Education, 14(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v41n3a1842
[14] Munyaneza, J. (2023). Parental involvement and student absenteeism in Rwanda’s Southern Province. Rwanda Educational Journal, 14(1).
[15] Muriithi, L. (2023). Correlational study on mentorship programs and dropout prevention in Kenya.
[16] Mutonyi, S., & Ogola, A. (2021). Descriptive survey on guidance/counseling and retention in Kenya.
[17] Mwangi, E., & Gachahi, M. (2021). Descriptive survey on instructional supervision effects in Kenya.
[18] Nabukenya, C. (2020). Survey-based study on capitation grant effects in Uganda.
[19] Nsengimana, J. (2021). Behavior monitoring and dropout prevention in Rwandan secondary schools. Rwanda Journal of Education, 3(1).
[20] OECD. (2021). Education at a glance 2021: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en
[21] Oluwaseun, A., & Bello, M. (2020). Quantitative analysis of academic progress tracking and dropout in Nigeria.
[22] REB. (2023). Secondary education progress report. Rwanda Education Board.
[23] Robinson, V., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. (2020). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: A review. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(3).
[24] Sahlberg, P. (2022). Finnish lessons 3.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.
[25] Suleiman, M., & Musa, B. (2019). Headteachers’ supervisory practices and student dropout in Nigerian public schools. Nigerian Journal of Educational Management, 7(2).
[26] Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922461.001.0001
[27] Tuyisenge, C., & Uwimana, D. (2023). Descriptive survey on resource management and dropout in Rwanda.
[28] UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023. UNESCO.
[29] UNICEF. (2023). Out-of-school children report: Eastern and Southern Africa. United Nations Children’s Fund.
[30] UNICEF. (2024). Annual report on girls’ education and dropout in Rwanda. UNICEF Rwanda.
[31] World Bank. (2021). Ending learning poverty: What will it take? World Bank Group.
