Exploring the Interplay Between Employee Well-Being and Job Satisfaction in the Gig Economy: A Study of On-Demand Service Workers in India

Authors

  • Dr. Neha Monga Assistant Professor, Department of Management, GNDU College, Jalandhar Author
  • Dr. Mandeep Kaur Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, GNDU College, Jalandhar Author
  • Dr. Sonia Kundra Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, GNDU College, Jalandhar Author
  • Dr. Ashish Arora Assistant Professor, Department of Management, GNDU College, Jalandhar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31305/ijmds.v15n10.013

Keywords:

Gig economy, Platform-based work, Employee well-being, Job satisfaction, Occupational stress, Factor analysis, Labor precarity, Emerging markets

Abstract

Background: The rapid expansion of the platform-based gig economy has radically transformed contemporary labour markets, offering unprecedented flexibility, but also generating considerable precarity. Although the macroeconomic impacts of platform labour have been well documented in the existing literature, a critical gap exists regarding the micro-level psychological outcomes for workers, especially in emerging markets. Objectives: This exploratory study identifies the multiple determinants that affecting employee well-being and job satisfaction of gig workers employed in on-demand transportation and food delivery services in Jalandhar, India. Methods: This study based on primary survey data of 100 active gig workers, based on a synthesised theoretical framework combining the Precarity Framework and Job Demands-Resources models. The latent dimensional structures of well-being and satisfaction are extracted using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) through Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with the Varimax rotation. Results: The empirical results indicate that the six factors are the primary determinants of employee well-being, strongly based on workplace safety, emotional health, work flexibility, and the burden of occupational stress, which together explain 61.35% of the variance. At the same time, job satisfaction is affected by pay fairness, work-life balance, work experience, and income stability (64.06% variance). Also, an Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression shows that Income Sufficiency and Work-Life Balance are the most important determinants of job satisfaction (R2 = 0.442), while physical workplace safety is statistically insignificant. K-Means clustering finally identifies three unique worker personas, revealing the disturbing fact that 35% of the workforce is in deep structural precarity and at risk of burnout.

References

[1] Ali, K. M. (2022). Understanding occupational stress and psychological well-being among gig workers. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1–23.

[2] Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056

[3] Berger, T. (2019). Gig work, job insecurity, and employee well-being. Journal of Labor Studies, 40(2), 210–225.

[4] Chatterjee, S. (2022). Remote work flexibility and employee well-being: Evidence from modern organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(5), 890–905.

[5] Cropanzano, R. (2000). Psychological well-being and job satisfaction as predictors of job performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 84–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8998.5.1.84

[6] Davidescu, A. A. M. (2020). Work flexibility, job satisfaction, and employee performance in modern organizations. Sustainability, 12(15), 6086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156086

[7] De Stefano, V. (2015). The rise of the just-in-time workforce: On-demand work, crowd-work, and labor protection in the gig-economy. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37, 471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2682602

[8] De Witte, H. (2019). Job insecurity and psychological well-being: Review of the literature and exploration of some unresolved issues. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(2), 155–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398302

[9] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 1(20), 416–436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n21

[10] Doeringer, P. B., & Piore, M. J. (2020). Internal labor markets and manpower analysis. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003069720

[11] Donovan, S. A., Bradley, D. H., & Shimabukuru, J. O. (2016). What does the gig economy mean for workers? Congressional Research Service.

[12] Duangupama, S. (2025). Influence of employee well-being and work flexibility on innovative work behavior and job performance. Tourism and Hospitality, 6(4), 166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp6040166

[13] Duxbury, L. (2019). Workplace flexibility and work-life balance: Implications for employee well-being. Journal of Management Studies, 56(7), 1354–1375.

[14] Ererdi, C. (2022). Flexible work arrangements and employee motivation: Reducing turnover intentions. Human Resource Development Review, 21(1), 65–80.

[15] Gabriel, A. S. (2020). Employee well-being and its impact on emotional exhaustion and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(6), 1234–1248.

[16] Glavin, P., Bierman, A., & Schieman, S. (2021). Uber-alienated: Powerless and alone in the gig economy. Work and Occupations, 48(4), 399–431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884211024711

[17] Graham, M., & Anwar, M. A. (2019). The global gig economy: Toward a planetary labor market? First Monday, 24(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i4.9913

[18] Healy, J., Nicholson, D., & Pekarek, A. (2017). Should we take the gig economy seriously? Labour & Industry: A journal of the social and economic relations of work, 27(3), 232–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2017.1377048

[19] Kässi, O., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2018). Online labour index: Measuring the online gig economy for policy and research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 137, 241–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.056

[20] Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (2019). The rise and nature of alternative work arrangements in the United States, 1995-2015. ILR Review, 72(2), 382–416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793918820008

[21] Kim, Y. G. (2023). Gig workers’ quality of life (QoL) and psychological well-being in service delivery platform. Sustainability, 15(11), 8679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118679

[22] Lehdonvirta, V. (2018). Flexibility in the gig economy: Managing time on three online piecework platforms. New Technology, Work and Employment, 33(1), 13–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12102

[23] Lobel, O. (2017). The gig economy & the future of employment and labor law. University of San Francisco Law Review, 51, 51.

[24] Ray, S. (2021). Work flexibility and employee outcomes in the digital era. Journal of Business Research, 124, 150–162.

[25] Salmah, M. (2024). Employee engagement, productivity, and well-being in the gig economy: A systematic review. International Journal of Applied Economics, 38(2), 112–128.

[26] Silvia, A. (2024). Job satisfaction and sustained engagement among gig workers in the ride-hailing industry. Asian Journal of Management, 15(1), 45–59.

[27] Soans, R., & Naik, S. (2024). Workplace well-being as a catalyst for organizational growth in the gig economy. Personnel Review, 53(2), 234–250.

[28] Stewart, A., & Stanford, J. (2017). Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the options? The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 28(3), 420–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304617722461

[29] Surie, A., & Sharma, L. V. (2019). Climate change, agrarian distress, and the role of digital labour markets: Evidence from Bengaluru. Decision, 46(2), 127–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-019-00213-w

[30] Umair, A. (2023). Examining technostress and its impact on worker well-being in the digital gig economy. Internet Research, 33(7), 206–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2022-0214

[31] Vallas, S., & Schor, J. B. (2020). What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46(1), 273–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857

[32] Varma, A. (2023). Working conditions and job satisfaction among gig economy delivery workers in Mumbai. Journal of Labor Research, 44(1), 55–72.

[33] Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Networked but commodified: The (dis)embeddedness of digital labour in the gig economy. Sociology, 53(5), 931–950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038519828906

[34] Wu, Q., Zhang, H., Li, Z., & Liu, K. (2019). Labor control in the gig economy: Evidence from Uber in China. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(4), 574–596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185619854472

[35] Yogesh, P. (2022). Employee job satisfaction and workplace challenges in the modern era. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 57(3), 415–429.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-15

How to Cite

Monga, N., Kaur, M., Kundra, S., & Arora, A. (2026). Exploring the Interplay Between Employee Well-Being and Job Satisfaction in the Gig Economy: A Study of On-Demand Service Workers in India. International Journal of Management and Development Studies, 15(10), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.31305/ijmds.v15n10.013

Similar Articles

1-10 of 85

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.