How Emotional Intelligence Helps Teachers: A Review of Different Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53983/ijmds.v14n1.002Keywords:
Emotional intelligence, Goleman model, Mayer-Salovey model, teacher effectiveness, educational outcomesAbstract
Emotional intelligence (EI) has become a critical component of successful teaching, improving the classroom atmosphere and the performance of the Teacher. In this paper, different models of emotional intelligence are examined along with their effects on the teaching profession and their suitability for faculty members in educational environments. This study emphasizes the important role that emotional intelligence (EI) plays in boosting teacher well-being, enhancing teacher-student interactions, and creating a productive learning environment by examining Goleman's mixed model, Mayer and Salovey's ability model, and Petrides and Furnham's trait model. Through the integration of results from multiple studies, the review demonstrates the advantages and disadvantages of each model in meeting the distinct emotional needs of educators. According to the analysis, the Mixed Model—in particular, Daniel Goleman's framework—is the most appropriate for faculty development in the education sector because it integrates personality traits, social skills, and emotional abilities to provide a holistic approach.
Downloads
References
Corcoran, R. T. (2012). How emotionally intelligent are pre-service teachers? Teaching and Teacher Education, 750-759.
Gerald Matthews, R. D. (2004). Emotional Intelligence in the Workplace: A Critical Review. Applied Phychology , 371-399.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bloomsbury Publisher.
Goleman, D. (1998). Working with Emotional Intelligence . Bantam Books .
J Mayer, p. s. (2004). Emotional Intelligence: Theory, Findings, and Implications. Phychological Inquiry, 197-215.
Marc A. Brackett, S. E. (2011). Emotional Intelligence: Implecations foe Personal, Social, Academic and Workplace Success. Social and psychology compass, 88-103.
Marc A. Brackett, S. E. (2011). Emotional Intelligence: implications for personal, social, academic and workplace success. social and personality psychology compass, 88-103.
Marie Clarke a, A. L. (2012). Evaluating initial teacher education programmes: Perspectives from the Republic of Ireland. Teaching and Teacher Education, 141-153.
Patricia A. Jennings, M. T. (2009). The Prosocial Classroom: Teacher Social and Emotional Competence in Relation to Student and Classroom Outcomes. Review of Educational Research , 491-525.
Petrides K V, F. A. (2001). Trait Emotional intelligence: phychomatric investigation with reference to established trait taxonomies . European journal of personality, 425-448.
Rivers, M. A. (2014). Transforming Students’ Lives with Social and Emotional Learning. Routledge.
Salovey & Mayer, J. (1990). Emotional Intelligence. imagination, cognition and personality, 185-211.
Salovey, P. &. (1997). Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications.
Schonert-Reichl, K. A. (2016). Mindfulness in Education: An Emerging area of research and practice. Child devlopment perspective , 154-160.
Wheatley., R. E. (2003). Teachers’ Emotions and Teaching: A Review of the Literature and Directions for Future Research. Educational Psychology Review., 327-358.
