Measuring the Enablers of Good Governance Practices and Mediating Role of Government to Promote Public Trust
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53983/ijmds.v13n11.003Keywords:
Public Trust, Responsiveness, Accountability, Transparency, Governance theory, Good Governance Practices (GGP)Abstract
Citizens consistently expect their government to demonstrate responsibility in every action, prioritizing the public's welfare. Drawing from the principles of virtuous governance, this research empirically explored how implementing best governance practices contributes to fostering public trust, focusing on the perceived responsiveness of authority. Data was collected from 430 respondents from five districts of Rajasthan and analyzed using Smart-PLS to construct measurement and structural models. The results indicated that when mediated through government agencies, effective governance practices exhibit both direct and indirect effects on public trust in the government. Sustained engagement and communication initiatives can cultivate a culture of ethical conduct, promoting robust and sustainable governance. Furthermore, it underscores the imperative for governments in emerging nations to prioritize the development of adequate IT infrastructure nationwide to ensure universal access to Internet services, particularly among residents in remote areas.
Downloads
References
Addo, A., & Senyo, P. K. (2021). Advancing E-governance for development: Digital identification and its link to socioeconomic inclusion. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101568
Asongu, S. A., & Odhiambo, N. M. (2019). Governance and social media in African countries: An empirical investigation. Telecommunications Policy, 43(5), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.10.004
Basu, S., Aulakh, P. S., & Munjal, S. (2021). Pluralistic ignorance, risk perception, and the governance of the dark side in peer-to-peer transactions: Evidence from the Indian banking industry. Journal of Business Research, 129(February), 328–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.061
Bătae, O. M., Dragomir, V. D., & Feleagă, L. (2021). The relationship between environmental, social, and financial performance in the banking sector: A European study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125791
Beshi, T. D., & Kaur, R. (2020). Public Trust in Local Government: Explaining the Role of Good Governance Practices. Public Organization Review, 20(2), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-019-00444-6
Beyers, F., & Heinrichs, H. (2020). Global partnerships for a textile transformation? A systematic literature review on inter- and transnational collaborative governance of the textile and clothing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 261, 121131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121131
Botrić, V., & Božić, L. (2021). The digital divide and E-government in European economies. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 34(1), 2935–2955. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1863828
Cheng, Y., & Han, P. (2021). Resource Endowment, Rural Governance, and the “New Agriculture” in China. Modern China, 47(2), 154–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700420976604
Cioroianu, I., Corbet, S., & Larkin, C. (2021). The differential impact of corporate blockchain-development as conditioned by sentiment and financial desperation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101814
Dadhich, M., & Bhaumik, A. (2023). Demystification of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy, Algorithmic Thinking, Cognitive Divide, Pedagogical knowledge: A Comprehensive Model. 2023 IEEE International Conference on ICT in Business Industry & Government (ICTBIG), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTBIG59752.2023.10456172
Dadhich, M., Opoku-mensah, E., Hiran, K. K., Akwasi, B., Tuffour, P., & Mahmoud, A. (2024). Exploring the mediating roles of social networks and trust in the blockchain-social sustainability nexus. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2024.2364649
Dadhich, M., Poddar, S., & Kant, K. (2022). Antecedents and consequences of patients ’ adoption of the IoT 4.0 for e-health management system: A novel PLS-SEM approach. Smart Health, 25(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smhl.2022.100300
Dadhich, M., Rathore, S., Akwasi, B., Ajibade, S. M., & Agozie, D. Q. (2023). Quantifying the Dynamic Factors Influencing New-Age Users’ Adoption of 5G Using TAM and UTAUT Models in Emerging Country: A Multistage PLS-SEM Approach. Education Research International, 1, 1–15.
Dadhich, M., Shukla, A., Pahwa, M. S., & Mathur, A. (2024). Decentralized Disruptive Crypto Landscape: How Digital Currencies Are Shaking up Finance? In S. Rajagopal, K. Popat, D. Meva, & S. Bajeja (Eds.), Advancements in Smart Computing and Information Security (pp. 268–282). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Dadhich, M., & Yadav Neetu. (2024). Satyadarshan Technologies & Services: Revolutionizing urban mobility? Emeral Emerging Markets Cases Studies, 14(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EEMCS-12-2023-0520
Doya, K., Ema, A., Kitano, H., Sakagami, M., & Russell, S. (2022). Social impact and governance of AI and neurotechnologies. Neural Networks, 152, 542–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2022.05.012
Dutta, A., & Fischer, H. W. (2021). The local governance of COVID-19: Disease prevention and social security in rural India. World Development, 138, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105234
Gao, J., Chu, D., Zheng, J., & Ye, T. (2022). Environmental, social and governance performance: Can it be a stock price stabilizer ? Journal of Cleaner Production, 379(P2), 134705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134705
Gaurav Kumar Singh & Manish dadhich. (2023). Empirical investigation of industry 4.0 for sustainable growth and implication for future-ready compatibility for cement industry of India. AIP Conference Proceedings 2521, 040026 (2023), 1–12. https://doi.org/978-0-7354-4650-2/$30.00
Gaurav Kumar Singh, M. D. (2022). Assessment of Multidimensional Drivers of Blockchain Technology (BoT) in Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM) of Indian Cement Industry: A Novel PLS-SEM Approach. In International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management (pp. 1–15). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLSM.2022.10045308
Georgios, C., & Barraí, H. (2021). Social innovation in rural governance: A comparative case study across the marginalised rural EU. Journal of Rural Studies, June. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.06.004
Hair Jr, Joseph F., G. Tomas M. Hult, Christian Ringle, and M. S. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).
Hooda, A., & Singla, M. L. (2020). Core – competencies – a key to future – oriented and sustainable e-governance implementation: A mixed method research. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(1), 80–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-12-2019-0122
Ji, L., & Huang, X. (2022). Analysis of social governance in energy-oriented cities based on artificial intelligence. Energy Reports, 8, 11151–11160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.08.206
Ju, J., Liu, L., & Feng, Y. (2019). Public and private value in citizen participation in E-governance: Evidence from a government-sponsored green commuting platform. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101400
Kashyap, R., & Saurav, V. (2022). Blockchain technology: Road to transform the Indian banking sector. Materials Today: Proceedings, xxxx, 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.774
Kassen, M. (2021). Understanding decentralized civic engagement: Focus on peer-to-peer and blockchain-driven perspectives on e-participation. Technology in Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101650
Khan, S., Umer, R., Umer, S., & Naqvi, S. (2021). Antecedents of trust in using social media for E-government services: An empirical study in Pakistan. Technology in Society, 64(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101400
Lee, M. T., & Suh, I. (2022a). Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship integrated modelling approach. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2022.100004
Lee, M. T., & Suh, I. (2022b). Understanding the effects of Environment, Social, and Governance conduct on financial performance: Arguments for a process and integrated modelling approach. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2022.100004
Lemma, T. T., Muttakin, M., & Mihret, D. (2022). Environmental, social, and governance performance, national cultural values and corporate financing strategy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 373(January), 133821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133821
Lv, P., & Xiong, H. (2022). Can FinTech improve corporate investment efficiency? Evidence from China. Research in International Business and Finance, 60, 101571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101571
Ly, B., & Ly, R. (2023). Emerging trends in social media for E-governance and citizen engagement: A case study of telegram in Cambodia. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 12(10), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100347
Mansoor, M. (2021). Citizens ’ trust in government as a function of good governance and government agency’s provision of quality information on social media during COVID-19. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), 101597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101597
Samsor, A. M. (2021). Challenges and Prospects of e-Government implementation in Afghanistan. International Trade, Politics and Development, 5(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITPD-01-2020-0001
Serres, C., Hudon, M., & Maon, F. (2022). Social corporations under the spotlight: A governance perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 37(3), 106192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2022.106192
Singh, G. K., & Dadhich, M. (2021). Impact of Total Quality Management on Operational Performance of Indian Cement Manufacturing Industry- A Structural Equation Remodeling Approach. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(7), 22–41.
Thornton, E. N. (2012). Governance within social media websites: Ruling new frontiers. Telecommunications Policy, 36, 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2012.01.002
Vitálišová, K., Murray-Svidroňová, M., & Jakuš-Muthová, N. (2021). Stakeholder participation in local governance as a key to local strategic development. Cities, 118(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103363
Wang, Z., Fu, H., Jian, Y., Qureshi, S., Jie, H., & Wang, L. (2022). On the comparative use of social media data and survey data in prioritizing ecosystem services for cost-effective governance. Ecosystem Services, 56, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101446
Xu, S., Sun, K., Yang, B., Zhao, L., Wang, B., & Zhao, W. (2021). Can public participation in haze governance be guided by government ? Evidence from large-scale social media content data mining. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128401