Teaching aids usage and Generic Skills Acquisition in Mathematics Subject in Public Secondary Schools in Rwanda: A Case of Bugesera District

Authors

  • Mr. NIRINGIYIMANA Seth School of Education, Mount Kenya University Rwanda
  • Dr. Hesbon Opiyo Andala, PhD School of Education, Mount Kigali University Rwanda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53983/ijmds.v13n8.002

Keywords:

Teaching Aids Usage, Generic skills, Mathematics Subject, Generic Skills Acquisition

Abstract

The research assess the extent to which various factors related to teaching aids usage are employed to enhance the acquisition of generic skills among students of mathematics in public secondary schools; identifies the specific generic skills in mathematics that students acquire as a result of using teaching aids in public secondary schools, and determines the relationship between the utilization of teaching aids and the acquisition of generic skills in mathematics in public secondary schools in Bugesera district, Rwanda. The study underscores the significance of teaching aids in improving mathematics education quality in Rwanda's public secondary schools, particularly in Bugesera district. By evaluating the impact of teaching aids on the acquisition of generic math skills, the study offers valuable insights for enhancing educational practices and informing evidence-based policy decisions using a mixed-methods approach that combines qualitative and quantitative data collection through case study and survey research designs. By capturing statistical trends and contextual insights from a targeted sample of 184 respondents, including mathematics teachers, head teachers, sector education inspectors, and students, the study provides a comprehensive understanding of how teaching aids influence student outcomes. Stratified and simple random sampling techniques were utilized to ensure the reliability and validity of the research. Data were collected through questionnaires, interviews, and observations. The study's internal consistency and accuracy were verified using the Content Validity Index (CVI) and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, while qualitative data were subjected to content analysis. Content analysis was used for qualitative data. Results indicate a significant integration of teaching aids into mathematics lessons, with 83.6% of respondents agreeing that these aids effectively enhance the acquisition of generic skills, reflected by a mean of 4.21 and a standard deviation of 1.16. Additionally, 60.9% of respondents agreed that the frequency of using teaching aids is sufficient to support skill acquisition, with a mean of 3.43 and a standard deviation of 1.21. The majority of respondents acknowledged the positive impact of teaching aids on students' motivation, engagement, and skill development, with 86.9% confirming their role in enhancing students' motivation to acquire generic skills. Moreover, 91.3% agreed that teaching aids engage students actively, fostering interest and participation in mathematics learning, as shown by a mean of 4.35 and a standard deviation of 0.56. However, 65.7% noted challenges related to the accessibility and availability of teaching aids, with a mean of 2.7 and a standard deviation of 1.57. Furthermore, the study has revealed a strong and positive correlations between the frequency, variety, and accessibility of instructional aids and the development of students' critical thinking, problem-solving, and logical reasoning skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, P., & Thomas, R. (2023). Sampling techniques in educational research: Ensuring accuracy and representation. Journal of Educational Research Methods, 15(1), 45-60.

Aslam, M., Ghaus, A., & Bajwa, M. (2017). Scaffolding learning through instructional resources: Enhancing cognitive skills in students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 142-153.

Bruner, J. S. (2019). The process of education. Harvard University Press.

Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2020). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. Wiley.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2021). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fiorella, L., & Kuhlmann, S. (2020). The cognitive benefits of integrating teaching aids in education: Enhancing critical thinking and numeracy skills. Educational Psychology Review, 32(4), 567-589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09552-

Johnson, B., & Turner, L. A. (2022). Data collection methods in educational research. Journal of Educational Research, 48(4), 215-230.

Kadzera, C. M. (2016). Instructional materials: Tools for facilitating effective teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Development, 46, 23-29.

Kozma, R. B. (2021). Learning with media: Implications for instruction. Educational Technology Publications.

MINEDUC. (2021). Annual Report on Educational Resources in Rwanda. Kigali: Ministry of Education.

Ministry of Education. (2018). Educational Reforms and Teaching Aids: Enhancing Quality Learning in Kenya. Nairobi: Ministry of Education.

Ministry of Education. (2021). Policy on Integrating Teaching Aids in Secondary Education. Nairobi: Ministry of Education.

Mugisha, J., Niyomugabo, E., & Rwibasira, F. (2023). The role of teaching aids in enhancing generic skills acquisition in mathematics among secondary school students in Rwanda. International Journal of Educational Research, 56(2), 145-159.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2019). Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Nyemaekile, G., & Polycarp, T. (2022). The use of instructional tools in mathematics education: A comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Resources, 18(4), 87-104.

Odhiambo, G. O. (2019). Education Reforms in Kenya: Realizing Vision 2030. International Journal of Educational Development, 67, 111-120.

Olubunmi, A., & Modupe, O. (2019). Availability and utilization of instructional materials for effective teaching of mathematics in junior secondary schools in Nigeria. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 10(2), 115-128.

Omariba, A. (2012). Accessibility of instructional resources in mathematics teaching. International Journal of Education and Development, 9(3), 56-71.

Oso, W. Y., & Onen, D. (2005). A general guide to writing research proposal and report: A handbook for beginning researchers. Kisumu: Options Printers and Publishers.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2021). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(3), 267-277.

Sweller, J. (2019). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Springer.

Umuhoza, C., & Uworwabayeho, A. (2021). Utilization of instructional resources in the teaching and learning of mathematics in Rwandan primary schools. International Journal of Educational Development, 45(1), 67-78.

UNESCO. (2016). Teaching and Learning: Achieving Quality for All. Paris: UNESCO.

Downloads

Published

31-08-2024

How to Cite

NIRINGIYIMANA , S., and H. O. Andala. “Teaching Aids Usage and Generic Skills Acquisition in Mathematics Subject in Public Secondary Schools in Rwanda: A Case of Bugesera District”. International Journal of Management and Development Studies, vol. 13, no. 8, Aug. 2024, pp. 15-29, doi:10.53983/ijmds.v13n8.002.

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)